Thursday, March 25, 2021
What Australians really think about climate change
Sampling, sampling, sampling. The revelation that only one in seven Australians take climate change seriously is very encouraging but ALL the figures below have to be taken with a large grain of salt.
The "sample" was derived from an online panel study and the biases of online studies are well-known, to say nothing of the inaccuracies in panel studies. Online samples tend to skew Left. So even the 7% is probably an overstimate
The journal article is "Australian voters’ attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants" in https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248268
Just one in seven Australians considered climate change their decisive issue when voting in the 2019 federal election.
But some 80 per cent say action to reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions is important, including almost 70 per cent of Coalition voters.
They are two key findings from new ANU research published today in the journal PLOS ONE, based on online and telephone surveys with more than 2000 Australian voters after the 2019 poll.
In the paper, researchers Dr Rebecca Colvin and Professor Frank Jotzo looked at some of the reasons why, in the “climate election,” the party that was offering the more “status quo” emissions policy was returned to government.
They found 52 per cent of survey respondents said climate change was a factor in how they voted in 2019, but it was the single biggest issue for just 13 per cent of voters – or slightly more than one in seven people.
Asked whether this finding could be a source of hope or despair for supporters of climate action, Dr Colvin said both interpretations were possible.
“One way to look at it is that there isn’t a massive unbridgeable divide across the political spectrum on climate change,” she told News Corp. “There are lots of people who say they want to see action on climate change but they’re not determining their votes on it – but that broad based of social support is there.”
*****************************************
Many young African-Australians are in jail. Some blame police, but the data tells a different story
It's the high rate of offending among the South Sudanese
There's a concerning trend in the kids we're locking up. For some, it's clear evidence of racist policing.
While overall youth crime rates have declined in Victoria, the imprisonment of African-Australian youth has spiked.
African (predominantly South Sudanese) youth comprise at least 19 per cent of young people in custody despite being less than 0.5 per cent of Victoria's youth population.
But are prejudice and police tactics behind numbers, or is the answer more complicated?
Between 2016 and 2018 a small number of African-Australian youth were involved in a number of highly publicised offences.
These incidents received extensive media attention — with some outlets criticised for politicising their coverage and demonising the African-Australian community.
For some commentators and community advocates, racial profiling was a factor in this sequence of offending, and the coinciding spike in African-Australian youth imprisonment — which has now reached concerning levels.
In a number of recent community surveys, African-Australian youth say they're being targeted and harassed by police in public places because of their race.
While the sample sizes of these reports are small, the concerns raised by the participants are similar to those expressed in the 2012 lawsuit.
For people who are regularly breaking the law, police attention is expected and should not come as a surprise.
But there are occasional incidents of overzealous policing, and perhaps isolated incidents of profiling.
Police behaviour can also stigmatise, even if it is unintended.
A young person who is publicly stopped and questioned on the street as part of routine police activity may feel signalled out and humiliated.
There is always room for improvement to ensure that people are treated with dignity and that procedural fairness is adhered to.
But it's unlikely police services have the explicit intention to disfavour particular cultural groups.
For the most part, police are reacting to information given to them by the public.
So what is behind the over-incarceration?
Higher rates of African-Australian youth imprisonment are most likely because of an increase in violent criminal activity by some members that group.
A recent study pointed to the significantly higher rate of "crimes against the person" by South Sudanese-born youth compared to Australian-born youth between 2015 and 2018.
Crimes against the person include serious offences such as robbery and assault, which often involve less police discretion. They're also crimes that tend to receive custodial sentences.
In contrast, rates for less serious crimes, such as public order and drug offences, have remained stable and relatively low for South Sudanese-born youth.
If police profiling of African-Australian young people is pervasive, one might have expected public order and drug offences to climb during a period of intense media coverage, given that such crimes generally involve more police discretion.
One may also expect to see over-representation right across the African-Australian diaspora if profiling was both rampant and regularly pulling kids into the justice-system.
However only specific African-Australian sub-groups (i.e., South Sudanese) have been over-represented in recent years.
This is likely the result of those groups being collectively exposed to a number of socio-economic and environmental risk factors that increase the likelihood of young people engaging in crime.
It is unlikely that alleged racial profiling by Victoria Police members is driving the imprisonment rates of African-Australian young people.
This does not suggest in any way that racial profiling does not occur at all. Some African-Australian young people have experienced adversarial confrontations with police, however it's not known how widespread these experiences are across the community.
Over-involvement in serious crimes most likely explains the concerning trends in African-Australian youth imprisonment.
****************************************
Greens senator retracts rape claim against Home Affairs Minister, apologises
This would normally be a matter of no general interest except for one thing: It is an example of the lie about rape that regularly sprouts from Leftist women: The lie that women do not lie about rape. "Believe the woman", they say.
Women in fact lie prolifically. There are many cases -- particularly in Britain -- where rape allegations have been found in court to be false. Britain has even jailed some of false accusers in the more egregious cases
It is just amazing how readily Leftists resort to psychopathic lies -- lies that are easily found out to be lies. If they wish something to be true, they act as if it were true. Their reality-contact is very poor It is a major mental defect in them
Greens senator Larissa Waters has issued an “unreserved” apology to Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton after calling him a “rape apologist” last month.
The Courier-Mail revealed on Saturday Mr Dutton had sent a legal letter to the Queensland senator demanding the apology and removal of online posts containing the insult.
Senator Waters’ comments were made on social media site Twitter in February, in reaction to a news article in which Mr Dutton referred to not knowing the “he said, she said” in the Brittany Higgins rape allegations that have rocked Parliament.
“WOMEN DO NOT LIE ABOUT BEING RAPED (Peter Dutton) YOU INHUMANE, SEXIST RAPE APOLOGIST,” she posted, with similar comments made in a press release.
Tonight she posted an apology to both Twitter and her own website.
“On 25 February 2021 I published a media release on my website, posted on my Twitter account, and made in the course of a press conference false and defamatory statements that Peter Dutton is a rape apologist, that he has sought to conceal and dismiss reports of rape, and that he has no sympathy for victims of rape,” she said.
“I accept that there was no basis for those allegations and that they were false. I unreservedly apologise to Minister Dutton for the hurt, distress and damage to his reputation I have caused him.”
Senator Waters’ original tweet was no longer online last night.
**********************************
Australian company signs deal to sell COVID nose spray in Britain
Australian biotech Starpharma is taking its COVID-fighting antiviral nasal spray to the world, signing a deal with UK chemist chain LloydsPharmacy to sell the product in Britain as the country emerges from lockdown.
The Melbourne-based company announced a deal on Thursday morning that will see its Viraleze virus-fighting product sold online in the UK starting next week. It will also be stocked in Lloyds’ 1400-strong pharmacy network.
Chief executive Jackie Fairley declined to comment on the value of the deal, but said the successful launch of the product overseas would pave the way for its long-term use beyond the pandemic. She said the company was also planning to register Viraleze in Australia, but would focus on COVID-ravaged Europe in the first instance.
“It’s been a pretty frenetic 12 months, and we’re delighted to have gotten to this point,” she said. “Clearly this market [Britain] is a very large market - this is a broad spectrum antiviral and it’s a product that has applications more broadly. The UK is currently locked down and will be emerging in a couple of weeks. This [deal] achieves a very high level of distribution through that market rapidly.”
The move makes Starpharma the first ASX-listed biotech to bring a COVID-19 preventative product to a global retail market. It comes after a year in which almost every drug developer around the world has tried to pivot its treatments towards the virus.
Starpharma’s shares opened up 3.5 per cent to $2.10 on the news, before dropping 1 per cent by 11am AEDT.
Starpharma started work on Viraleze around a year ago, convinced that SPL7013, the active antiviral compound that it already uses in registered antiviral condoms and sexual health products, could prove useful in stopping SARS-CoV-2 in its tracks.
Unlike vaccines for coronavirus, Viraleze has not gone through large-scale human trials and instead has been tested in the laboratory for its effectiveness. The company has been able to launch the product quickly because the active ingredients have already been reviewed and registered for use in Europe.
The company says the product is a “broad spectrum antiviral” spray that has been shown to inactivate 99.99 per cent of the virus that causes COVID-19 in lab studies.
The product is intended to be used alongside vaccines and other preventative measures as an extra level of protection against the virus and other viruses including influenza for candidates such as healthcare workers.
Dr Fairley said Viraleze was designed to be used in the overall battle against COVID alongside masks and vaccines.
“We’re not making a claim that [it] is the same as vaccines,” she said.
************************************
Also see my other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE TIED)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
***************************************
Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Golden Gaytime could be forced to change its name because LGBT community finds it 'offensive'
Australia's popular Golden Gaytime ice cream could be forced to change its name after being slammed by the LGBT community as 'offensive'.
Brian Mc, from Melbourne, launched a petition to replace the name of the 62-year-old treat, prompting a heated battle with owner Streets.
'As a part of the LGBTQIA+ community I believe my sexual identity is owned by me, not a brand and that the outdated meaning no longer applies. Isn't it time for this double entendre to end?' he wrote on the online petition, which has garnered 800 signatures.
'Under the law they are seen the same, discrimination means being treated unfairly or not as well as others because of a protected characteristic like age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, race or disability.
'It's not my place to tell Streets what to call their re-branded product, but I do feel it's time that the Golden Gaytime is called out for being outdated, especially when Streets is releasing new products and cross promotions in 2021.
'Just to be a gay man, even in 2021 is still hard … (we) still have a long way to go to be fully accepted as equals, but if we see an area in life that's not equal, and we are able to change it for the better, why wouldn't you speak up?'
Mr Mc said his aim isn't for the product to be cancelled, but is calling for 'Gay' to be removed from its name.
The ice cream giant issued a statement saying that the first Streets Gaytime was released in Australia was in 1959 'when the word 'gay' had not yet been applied to sexual preference.
'The origin of the Gaytime name was and remains related to having a joyous or happy time and was meant to capture the pleasure that comes with enjoying an ice cream.
**************************************
Locally produced AstraZeneca ‘single best thing’ as government gives up on international supply
Australia will have no certainty around its vaccine rollout until CSL starts distributing locally produced doses, as European authorities continue to block attempts to export internationally manufactured AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines.
The government is also no longer relying on getting any more doses of AstraZeneca from Europe as CSL-Seqirus ramps up to produce 50 million doses throughout the year.
Australia was due to get 3.8 million doses of the European-made AstraZeneca in February, but Health Department secretary Professor Brendan Murphy said neither the company nor Australia knew that supply would be stymied by Europe as the continent battles ongoing coronavirus epidemics.
“It’s not been possible until now to have certainty in planning,” he told a Senate estimates hearing on Wednesday morning.
Under questioning from Labor senator Murray Watt, Professor Murphy said early projections of having 4 million people vaccinated by the end of March were based on receiving those AstraZeneca doses, plus international shipments of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
“That was patently unachievable given that we didn’t get those international doses,” he said. “We’ve been working with Europe just about every day to try and get AstraZeneca released. It’s been a huge effort.”
On Tuesday evening, the AstraZeneca vaccine being manufactured by CSL in Victoria passed the final hurdle, after the Therapeutic Goods Administration approved the release of the first four batches - a total of 832,200 doses.
Professor Murphy said securing local vaccine production was “the single best thing we’ve done in this vaccine rollout”.
“Until we had this secure supply, every piece of advice we provide has been indicative,” he said. “Even the Pfizer doses, which have come in, fortunately, on a regular basis, have had a week to week uncertainty about [them].”
***************************************
Ramping ambulances lose up to 185 hours in day
Ambulances spent up to 185 hours ramped in one day as leaked internal reports further reveal the ramping crisis gripping emergency departments across the state.
The Courier-Mail can reveal paramedics spent 185 hours waiting to offload patients and prepare for their next callout at Ipswich, Sunshine Coast University, Cairns and Gold Coast University hospitals on Sunday.
As the government announced yesterday it was convening talks with stakeholders, 15 ambulances sat ramped at Gold Coast University Hospital and patients brought to the Cairns Hospital via ambulance faced a three-hour wait.
The leaks came as Health Minister Yvette D’Ath defended the under-pressure system, calling on the Commonwealth to find room for almost 600 people who are using public hospitals while waiting to be moved to aged-care and disability facilities.
She said 60 beds were being used by COVID-19 patients while attributing some of the constraint to clearing elective surgery lists that had backed up during the pandemic.
“Emergency departments across the state are seeing significant, sustained and unprecedented demand pressures,” she said.
The 185 hours – referred to as lost QAS “availability” – are calculated from when an ambulance arrives at a hospital with a patient to when it indicates it’s ready to respond to another job.
The government was peppered with ramping questions by the opposition in parliament yesterday, where leader David Crisafulli claimed Labor was losing control of the health system.
******************************************
Prosecutor tells Senate Estimates they are considering dropping charges against ATO whistleblower Richard Boyle
Prosecutors will decide whether to drop charges against Australian Taxation Office (ATO) whistleblower Richard Boyle within the next week.
On Tuesday night, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Sarah McNaughton, told Senate estimates that the CDPP was considering whether or not it should drop the charges against Mr Boyle, a former debt collection officer at the ATO's Adelaide office.
Mr Boyle is relying on the public interest disclosure defence in pleading not guilty to offences including using a listening device to monitor a private conversation, recording another person's tax file number and disclosing protected information.
A Senate report last year found that ATO did a "superficial" investigation into Mr Boyle's public interest disclosure about the ATO misusing its powers against small businesses.
Blowing the whistle should not destroy your life
A single whistleblowing law and authority to protect those who disclose wrongdoing could boost protections.
On Wednesday night, Ms McNaughton responded to questioning by independent senator Rex Patrick about whether the charges would be dropped.
"We can indicate that we have received materials and that includes a copy of the Senate report," Ms McNaughton said.
"I can also indicate that we have indicated to the court that we will be considering these matters in relation to whether or not the matters should be no-billed (discontinued) within three weeks from the 10th of March.
"We are considering whether or not it should continue, and that decision — we have indicated to the court — we hope to be making by around about the 31st of March, and beyond that I'm really not in a position to comment."
Public servant turned whistleblower
Mr Boyle became a whistleblower in October 2017 when he made an internal public interest disclosure to the ATO.
It was only after the ATO dismissed his internal disclosure about heavy-handed debt collection practices at the Adelaide office branch that Mr Boyle took his claims public via an ABC Four Corners investigation.
The media investigation revealed ATO staff were instructed to use an aggressive debt collection practice known as garnishee notices, which can have an adverse impact on vulnerable individuals and businesses.
Mr Boyle's case is the first major test case of protections available under the Public Interest Disclosure Act (2013).
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) has already reduced the charges against Mr Boyle from 66 to 24.
But if found guilty of each of the alleged offences, Mr Boyle could still face a maximum sentence that means he spends the rest of his life in jail.
A 'huge injustice'
Senator Rex Patrick told ABC News that "a huge injustice would occur if the prosecution were allowed to continue".
"It is not in the public interest to prosecute whistleblowers," he said.
Senator Patrick said the ATO "improperly rejected" Mr Boyle's public interest disclosure.
"At great risk to himself, he [Mr Boyle] then went to the media and the improper conduct was exposed which ultimately caused a stop to the abuse of power," Senator Rex Patrick said.
"Mr Boyle acted courageously in the public interest only to find himself charged and before a court."
************************************
Also see my other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE TIED)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
***************************************
Tuesday, March 23, 2021
‘Life-threatening’: Fears as downpour continues in S.E. Queensland, causing floods, landslides
These stories of destructive weather always bemuse me. When I look out my front door I never see anything like the weather report. And so it is at the moment. As I write this at lunchtime on Tuesday (23rd), we have had some prolonged showers earlier on but it is not raining at the moment. It has certainly rained fairly continuously in the last few days but very little of that has been heavy falls
There have always been flood-prone areas in Brisbane but I can remember worse flooding only a few years back. I certainly encountered no holdups on the road this morning or yesterday
Parts of southeast Queensland have recorded almost half a year’s worth of rain in two days as the relentless deluge continues, with fears that even more rain could cause flash flooding and potentially deadline landslips.
From Birdsville in the west to the southeast coast, hundreds of roads were cut, including the Cunningham Highway, and properties isolated, while homes in the Gold Coast hinterland were evacuated as torrential rain sent landslides and waterfalls tumbling down hillsides.
Rainfall records that have stood for more than a century in some places have been smashed.
In the 24 hours to 9am, North Tamborine recorded 242mm, with more than 550mm recorded in the past two days. Nearby Mount Tamborine, Upper Springbrook and Hotham Creek all recorded over 200mm in the past 24 hours, with two-day tallies of well over 400mm.
North Stradbroke Island also recorded more than 200mm yesterday.
Further west, Stanthorpe recorded its wettest March day in more than a century, while Applethorpe set a new March daily rainfall record with 86mm.
Flooding is predicted for Beaudesert on Tuesday afternoon, but it is expected to fall well short of the levels seen in the wake of Cyclone Debbie four years ago.
Springbrook has borne the brunt of Queensland’s heavy weather over the past week with 397mm of recorded rainfall. North Tamborine closely followed with 382mm recorded rainfall, Worongary Creek 369mm, Bonogin 364mm, Mount Tamborine 349mm, Clearview 361mm, Possum Creek 342mm, Oxenford Weir 331mm, Tallebudgera Creek Road 318mm and Molendinar being hit with 314mm.
James Thompson from the Bureau of Meteorology said Brisbane could have anywhere between 35-60mm of rainfall today.
************************************
The Mother of All Battles
Bettina Arndt
As the Christian Porter saga continues to dominate the news, there’s a lesson playing out for all the woke men who hope that by drinking the feminist Kool-Aid they will protect themselves from being targeted during the ongoing anti-male crusade.
Our Attorney General is a classic. Porter has been sucking up to the feminist mob for decades. Just look at his incredible performance back in 2015 on the ABC’s Q&A, just after he’d announced 100 million dollars funding for the domestic violence industry. There he was spewing out all the buzzwords they wanted to hear, claiming the entire problem was due to vicious, misogynist men and telling a young male audience member to listen to women, believe women.
Many of the prominent feminists he fawned over are now delighting in throwing him under the bus – like former UTS communications lecturer Jenna Price happily declaring his career is over whilst Julia Baird gleefully tweets that the Porter case has triggered a “cultural reckoning”.
Even more ironic is the fact that Christian Porter ignored appeals from prominent people complaining about the defamation case of Fr John Fleming, a Catholic priest who unsuccessfully sued an Adelaide newspaper which destroyed his reputation by publishing details of unsubstantiated allegations involving historic child sexual abuse.
Read this account by law professor Augusto Zimmermann of the legal flaws in the subsequent unsuccessful appeal which overturned the presumption of innocence and set a dangerous precedent in lowering the standard of proof required in defamation cases where criminal allegations are involved. The judge chose to believe the uncorroborated narrative offered by the accuser in the face of evidence that powerfully contradicted her version of events.
Zimmermann believes that the Fleming case could have bearing on Porter’s defamation case.
Women’s right to feel safe.
One of the most infuriating themes emerging in the ongoing feminist campaign is the facile dream of a utopia in which all women feel completely safe walking at night. We’ve seen endless women complaining they don’t dare walk alone in the streets in the dark, something they see as the fault of all men. Here’s the SBS even taking up the ludicrous suggestion from a British MP proposing a 6pm curfew for all men.
The reality is that men have far more reason to feel unsafe on the streets at night than women do. The latest AIHW figures show male rates of assault injury hospitalisations are almost twice that of females - 64% (14,085 cases) compared to 36% for females (7,972 cases).
Many Australian men as well as women are wary of walking the streets in dubious neighbourhoods, particularly very young or frail older men. But let’s not forget this is, comparatively, a very safe country and overall violence rates are on the decrease. The AIHW statistics show assaults have gone down significantly, with a 3% annual drop since 2007-8. The ABS’s Personal Safety Survey shows a drop in experiences of physical violence, falling from 7.5% in 2005 to 4.5% in 2016.
Naturally, men’s experience doesn’t rate a mention in the current narrative. We simply don’t care about men being bashed or beaten or stabbed. The only time we get upset about men being attacked seems to be when young men are king hit, taken out in a one-punch assault by a stranger. When a few cases of this started happening some years ago we were happy to close down the night life of Sydney.
But that was an aberration. In the current manufactured outrage about protecting women, men’s safety is irrelevant.
At least most people seem to have twigged to the fact that the whole campaign is a cynical exercise to take out ScoMo and his government. How revealing that the organizer of women’s march was blatantly tweeting back in January, seeking ideas to damage the Coalition.
As the weeks have rolled on, we have seen more evidence that the rage about women’s safety is blatant political opportunism, egged on by the usual biased media playing down complaints about sexist bullying in Labor party offices in order to focus exclusively on the allegations against Coalition men. Naturally, they choose to ignore Nicolle Flint’s expose of the hypocrisy of Penny Wong and her Labor colleagues who turned a blind eye to the appalling sexist treatment Flint received curtesy of the Get Up thugs.
While many women have been seduced into signing up to this cultural event, I’m also receiving a flood of mail from female correspondents who see through the whole charade. Like an 80-year-old retired GP who wrote saying she “is fed up with all the stuff in the media about Grace Tame, and the discussions about rape, etc. The message feminists are giving is very dangerous for our society.”
Or the younger female who said she is “sickened to see the push by modern feminists, activists, and SJWs to ostracise, sedate, and punish men so unfairly to the extent of removing their right to fair legal processes.”
Our failed criminal justice system
Many have written suggesting I put together data to dismantle the lies being promoted about the supposed failure of our criminal justice system to deal properly with rape accusations. I’m keen to do that and would welcome your help in taking apart the statistics but a complete analysis will take time.
As a starting point, let’s have a quick look at the latest voodoo statistics being used to fuel the current debate. I’m reminded of Andrew Lang’s telling comment that some people use statistics as a drunk man uses a drunk post – for support, not illumination.
Helen Trinca in The Weekend Australian claims the conviction rate in rape court cases “sits at a shockingly low 2 per cent.” This is total nonsense. Latest figures from the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics BOSCAR show 66% of sexual assault cases result in a guilty verdict.
Just how the feminists have conjured up the oft-quoted 2% figure remains a mystery – but it appears they inflate the numbers of rape victims by not using assaults reported to the police but rather self-defined victim figures from the ABS PPS which includes a wonderfully broad definition.
In fact, that survey is pretty illuminating, telling us a great deal about why so many of these cases don’t end up in court.
Here’s some of the facts about those rape statistics they won’t tell you.
We’re not just talking about what most people think of as ‘rape” but any sexual act involving force or coercion, including attempts to force someone into sexual activity.(PSS)
Many of these cases involve young women - over a quarter (27%) of female victims were aged between 15 and 19 years. (ABS Recorded Crimes)
Most victims (87%) knew their offender – so chances are many are date rape cases revolving around the murky complexities of consent. (ABS)
Half the women believed that alcohol or another substance contributed to the sexual assault. (AIHW)
Only 13 % reported the assault to police. The major reasons for not doing so included a third who felt they could deal with it themselves, and another third who did not regard it as a serious offence. (AIHW)
Almost half the women didn’t see what happened to them as a crime. Twenty two percent saw it as something that just happens. (AIHW)
Back in 2009 BOSCAR investigated why fewer cases were going through to trial and found one of the major reasons was there had been an increase in cases where the victim knew the offender and didn’t want to give evidence against the accused person.
While it is certainly true that many women who are raped don’t trust the criminal system to provide them with justice, this is the other side of the picture that is never discussed. The fact is that many young women who have experiences now being defined as sexual assault don’t see what happened to them as particularly serious and feel they can deal with it themselves. And thankfully, many don’t see a confusing drunken hook-up as reason to punish the man for what happened.
Many of these young women know these cases are not going to stand up in court, yet the arrogant feminists are telling them that they know better. That they should be pushing the justice system to give them a hearing, even if a jury then throws the case out. Of course, if a jury decides the evidence isn’t there to find the man guilty, this fuels feminist outrage about injustice towards women. Pretty neat, eh?
Naturally, the feminists are arguing women’s recalcitrant attitudes towards their own experiences simply point to the need for educating women that all sexual assault experiences are serious criminal offences, and the men deserve to be punished.
That’s actually what they will achieve unless we start to speak out, encouraging young women to make more sensible decisions about how they conduct their sexual lives. It’s so dangerous allowing sexual consent courses to be taught in schools and universities where intoxicated women are regarded as not able to give consent – so her drunk partner is always the rapist. And she has the right to change her mind afterwards.
We all must join the conversation, parents must write to schools, talk to other parents. We need to challenge the anti-male rhetoric dominating current discussions, by adding comments to online articles, or joining debates on social media. Think about the generations of young men growing up in these troubled times. We owe it to them to fight back.
Bettina Arndt newsletter: newsletter@bettinaarndt.com.au
*******************************************
The urban farmers taking over someone else's backyard as a reprieve from the pandemic
This sounds an excellent idea. My backyard is available
On a quiet street in suburban Melbourne, there's no sign of the transformation taking place.
Behind an old cottage in Fawkner, Catie Payne and George Clipp carefully tend to rows of flourishing crops.
The pair have long wanted to try their hand at farming. But despite years of experience working on market gardens and farms across Australia and abroad, they were unable to afford land of their own.
That is, until an innovative project in Melbourne's north gave them the chance to try their hand at urban farming — using someone else's backyard.
"It's wildest dream material for us," says 32-year-old Payne.
"We'd long chatted about how great it would be for folks with unused land to connect with those who'd love to tend a little patch of land."
The Backyard Farmers project is the brainchild of Growing Farmers, a community regenerative urban farming group, created in early 2020 to strengthen local food security and sustainability.
By connecting aspiring farmers like Payne and Clipp with people happy to share their backyards, the group hopes to foster a win-win relationship that could be replicated across the country.
"I'd been moaning about needing to do the mowing and I saw the ad and thought, 'that's what I need'," laughs Sapphire McMullan-Fisher, who decided to volunteer her property after coming across a flyer for the project at a local market garden.
A mycologist at Melbourne's Royal Botanic Gardens, McMullan-Fisher is also a lifelong gardener, passionate about healthy soil and the biodiversity it supports.
But after buying her house several years ago with a friend, McMullin-Fisher's plans to renovate were shelved, leaving her to battle weeds and grass in her large backyard.
"I've always worked with people to do things, so I was totally ready for someone else to come and take responsibility for this space," she says.
"Productive food for the community, paid or unpaid or however it evolves — why wouldn't you support that?"
A burgeoning local food system
With McMullan-Fisher's help, Payne and Clipp have been hard at work since Melbourne's restrictions began easing late last year.
What was once a tangle of weeds and grass is now 60 square metres of crops, ranging from tomatoes and pumpkins to bush foods like midyim berries and native river mint.
They haven't decided whether they'll sell or donate their harvests through a local food hub, but they have plenty of plans for the patch, which they'll have access to for at least six months.
In return, their host gets to see her backyard turned into a productive oasis and share in the organic produce it creates.
"The opportunity to be part of a burgeoning local food system — where backyards become mini-farms and people step up to share, collaborate and compromise — is exciting," says Payne.
With the project well underway, the group hopes to build on a pandemic-driven surge of interest in food growing.
More than 60 per cent of those who participated in the 2020 Pandemic Gardening Survey, conducted by Sustain: The Australian Food Network, said they had increased their edible food growing over the past 12 months.
Many cited the sense of reassurance and wellbeing it gave them.
"We're interested in not only growing food but also in growing resilient and connected communities around that," Growing Farmers president Alice Crowe says.
"When people work together on something they believe in, it creates a kind of glue between them. "People supporting other people and having their daily lives entwined in even a small way — that is community to me." 'It reminds us how connected we are'
Like many suburbs across Australia, Fawkner's multicultural traditions and generous blocks make it ideal for edible gardening, says Crowe.
"This area has a rich food-growing history with a lot of Italian and Greek migrants, as well as people from Arabic-speaking countries, who have always been really invested in the ethos of home food-growing and providing for yourself," she says.
"It also seems to attract people who are interested in nature, and interested in how we live and how we eat. People here are very connected."
Long-term, Growing Farmers hopes to unlock some of the area's public land for a large-scale market garden. That would allow residents to grow food for the local community, Crowe says, while giving novice farmers the opportunity to learn those skills.
"Anyone who grew a tomato during lockdown — even a little bit of their own food — knows that feeling of how satisfying is it to be working with the processes of nature," she says.
"It reminds us how connected we are with the earth and there's a feeling of deep satisfaction that comes from that."
Checking a bed of ripening blackberries in a community garden across town, gardener Meg knows that feeling well.
Eight years ago, the Caulfield South Community Garden was an abandoned tennis court, sitting forgotten behind a church.
Today, it is a beloved sanctuary of communal veggie beds, pots of herbs and trees laden with fruit.
Old church pews dot the garden, which is open every day to members who share in its harvest, and anyone else who wants to visit.
During Melbourne's first lockdown, Meg (who didn't want her surname used) and fellow volunteers began delivering bags of produce to members who were self-isolating.
Inspired by wartime Victory Gardens, they then began raising masses of vegetable seedlings to give away.
"Growing your own food, whether in a full-on homestead situation, or simply getting a few herbs going on your kitchen windowsill, is an incredibly empowering act which can help re-connect us with the natural world," Meg says.
"The list of benefits really goes on and on, but one of the big ways I think it supported many people during lockdown was by encouraging mindfulness and ritual, and bringing a little bit of joy and wonder into our worlds."
'A space where people feel they can go at any time'
The Isolation Gardening Project saw more than 2,000 free pots and punnets of seedlings, as well as seeds, shared with the community.
As word of the project spread, the garden's social media following tripled in size. Queues formed each week when plants and seeds were ready.
"People were incredibly grateful," says Meg. "One woman said she cried when she picked up her first punnet of seedlings — she was just so overwhelmed by the support of the community."
During Melbourne's tough Stage 4 lockdown, some volunteers also used their daily hour of permitted exercise to work in the garden — as a way of looking after both the plants, and their own mental health.
"The garden has been a godsend for me," says Anne, a member who's dropped in to do some weeding and harvest rhubarb. "At home I kept watching the news and waiting for the daily numbers of cases," she adds. "But I didn't think of that at all when I was working here in the garden."
**************************************
Company swings to loss amid delays to New Acland mine
Delays to expansion caused by ‘vocal activists’ are costing jobs in Queensland and hurting the broader business, says coal miner.
Listed miner New Hope Group says continued uncertainty around the approval of stage three of its New Acland Coal Mine in Queensland could see the number of employees at the site fall from more than 100 to around a dozen while damaging the broader company, which has swung to a half-year loss.
The company on Tuesday said revenue for the period declined 34.4 per cent to $405m while a net loss of $55m was recorded, compared to a $69.7m profit in the prior comparable period.
An interim dividend of four cents a share, fully franked, was declared.
At the end of the last financial year the $1.10bn miner recorded a $156m annual loss, suspended its dividend and cut 200 jobs associated with its New Acland Coal Mine due to approval delays.
Last month, the High Court ordered fresh hearings into the planned expansion of the mine, after a group of Darling Downs landholders won an appeal against the miner’s moves.
On Tuesday New Hope CEO Reinhold Schmidt said this continuing regulatory uncertainty surrounding the New Acland coal mine was impacting the broader business and costing more jobs.
“Redundancies continue as a result of nearing final stage 2 coal at New Acland,” Mr Schmidt said.
“With the High Court of Australia ordering New Acland back to the Land Court of Queensland in the first quarter of FY22, and the prospect of the project being placed in care and maintenance, a further impairment of the asset has been accounted for in the half year results.
“Despite the ongoing delays, brought about by a handful of vocal activists, the company remains committed to push for the approval of stage 3.”
The Australian understands that between 20 and 30 Acland workers will be made redundant in the coming months, bringing the mine’s headcount under 100, compared to a recent high of 300 in November 2019.
If approval for stage 3 is not granted by November, the mine is expected to go into care and maintenance mode, necessitating only a fraction of the current workforce to stay on site.
Additionally, the company has within the last half year made approximately one dozen employees redundant at its Queensland Bulk Handling ports business and shed 80 corporate head office positions.
Company accounts show a $40.25m before tax impairment charge relating to Queensland coal mining assets, a $1.6m impairment charge relating to Queensland coal exploration and $10.1m in group redundancy costs.
A spokesman for the company said New Hope had received “less than $10m” from the government’s Jobkeeper scheme.
Despite the regulatory hurdles faced by the New Acland mine, Mr Schmidt said a foundation has been set for a strong second half, with coal prices lifting and production at its Bengalla mine improving.
“The Newcastle 6000 index has recovered from the lows in 2020 of US$50 to the current level in excess of US$90,” Mr Schmidt said.
“Bengalla continues to perform strongly for the business and, although production was down slightly in the first half due to the major dragline shut, it was above expectations.
“The investment in the dragline has delivered continued improvement in productivity to ensure a strong performance into the future.
“The focus moving forward is to increase annual production to the approved permitted capacity of the operation whilst maintaining safety and cost efficiencies.”
New Hope also separately addressed media speculation concerning potential legal action by the liquidators of two subsidiaries in voluntary administration - Northern Energy Corporation and Colton Coal - against the company “in connection with alleged voidable transaction, insolvent trading, asset transfers and breaches of directors’ duties, in respect of claims the Liquidators estimate to be valued at $174.1 million plus interest and costs.”
“Although the Company has not been served with any proceedings, it intends to defend vigorously any proceedings that are commenced,” New Hope said in a statement.
************************************
Also see my other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE TIED)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
***************************************
Monday, March 22, 2021
Bipartisan motion calls out China’s treatment of Uighurs
I guess it is very wicked of me but I feel no regret about China's treatment of the Uighurs. Have we forgotten the Ürümqi riots of a few years ago in which Uighurs attacked Han Chinese? The Uighurs were making a nuisance of themselves in a typical Muslim way before the Chinese government (composed of Han Chinese) aroused itself to do something about them.
China wants a permanent solution to Uighur aggression and they rightly see that any solution will have to be a cultural one. So they are trying to knock their primitive Muslim religion out of the Uighurs. If the Uighurs abandoned their religion in favour of Confucian ideals, their oppression would end.
Muslims have done plenty of attacking us -- remember 9/11/2001? So it is plenty time for them to get some of their own back
Australian Uighurs are urging all federal MPs to support a bipartisan motion in Parliament which criticises China for “serious and systematic breaches of human rights” in Xinjiang.
The government has allowed debate on the motion put forward by veteran Liberal MP Kevin Andrews and Labor MP Chris Hayes, which will mark the strongest ever condemnation by the Australian Parliament of the Chinese government’s treatment of Uighurs.
The motion, introduced on Monday, urges the United Nations to investigate Beijing for its re-education camps and calls on the Australian government to ensure the country is not profiteering off forced labour in Xinjiang.
The Chinese government has repeatedly denied accusations of human rights abuses, including genocide, in the far western province.
Independent senator Rex Patrick last week accused the Australian government of failing to call out China’s mistreatment of Uighurs after it blocked his attempt to push through a Senate motion that would have recognised the Chinese government’s actions against the Muslim minority as “genocide”.
While not going that far, the resolution debated on Monday acknowledges parliaments and governments of other countries - including Britain, Netherlands, the United States and Canada - have recently said China’s actions in Xinjiang amount to genocide under international law.
The Australian Uighur Association’s Bahtiyar Bora said all members of Parliament should support the new motion and demand the Australian government “take much stronger action on what many believe is genocide taking place in plain sight”.
“At least one million innocent civilians have been locked up for no reason in a network of several hundred prisons,” he said. “This is beyond the usual left=right divide - this is about basic human dignity and the future of the entire Uighur population.”
Ramila Chanisheff from Australian Uighur Tangritagh Women’s Association said democratic nations such as Australia had a duty to call out China for its actions.
“The Chinese government has also separated thousands of children from their parents and placed them in special orphanages, in order to indoctrinate them,” she said.
Private members’ motions do not normally go to a vote, but it was given an hour of allocated time for debate from 10.15am. The Coalition and Labor were given 12 speakers each to debate the motion.
Mr Andrews said there was “overwhelming evidence of the cruel, inhumane and brutal practices of the Chinese Communist regime”.
“The most egregious, systematic abuse of human rights in the world is occurring in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of western China,” Mr Andrews said during his speech. “It has been occurring for several years. It involves the imprisonment, torture and enslavement of millions of ethnic Uyghurs, who comprise some 90 % of the population in the southern region of Xinjiang.”
Earlier this year the BBC reported first-hand accounts of systematic rape, sexual abuse and torture in Uighur detention camps.
Philip Citowicki, who was a policy adviser to former foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop, said the motion was a reminder that many federal MPs were deeply concerned about the situation in Xinjiang.
What are Magnitsky sanctions and why does Russia oppose them?
″This bipartisan motion was long in the making and acts as a release valve for many MPs who have wanted to speak up but have been rightly carefully managed by governments and its desire to limit commentary outside of the control senior officials,” he said.
“Airing their grievances on the floor of the house offers an opportunity for many MPs to push the conversation on a recognition of genocide and similarly speak out as other parliaments around the world have....Without a doubt, the government would be very mindful of just how this would play out diplomatically and seek to carefully manage escalating tensions.”
****************************************
Ambos waste 10,000 hours waiting around
Paramedics waited almost 10,000 hours with patients outside overloaded hospitals in February, stopping them from getting back on the road to help other sick and injured Queenslanders and prompting calls for a review of the health system which “is not coping”.
Startling new data obtained by The Courier-Mail has revealed ambulance officers lost more time waiting with patients last month compared to the same period last year despite there being less patients.
The revelation has prompted United Workers Union (UWU) national ambulance co-ordinator Fiona Scalon to call for a system review – similar to that conducted in 2013 amid a ramping crisis.
“We’re back to the stage where we think that level of scrutiny is needed again,” she said.
“UWU delegates are working with QAS to affect change in the areas that QAS has control over but the majority of the issue for our members stem from the fact that the Health and Hospital system is just not keeping up with demand.”
The Sunday-Mail recently revealed patients had waited up to seven hours with paramedics before being moved to a bed, with increased demand being reported across the state.
It can today be revealed that a patient more recently waited eight hours at the Ipswich Hospital.
And Ms Scalon said every hospital in Brisbane was at capacity by 3pm on Thursday this week.
New figures show QAS “lost” 9213.34 hours last month while waiting for patients to be admitted to hospitals across the Sunshine Coast, Metro North, Metro South, Gold Coast and West Moreton.
This is compared to 5527.8 hours last February when there were 393 more patients.
Ambulances just missed their targets to attend the most critical jobs between February 1 and March 17 this year across Metro North and South – with 50 per cent responding to 1A jobs in 8.5 minutes. The target is 8.2 minutes.
Health and Ambulance Services Minister Yvette D’Ath said the latest data showed 100 per cent of the most urgent Category 1 ED patients were being treated within two minutes.
“ED presentations in January were up 32,000 on the same time last year – with more than 212,000 presentations in total,” she said.
“Demand is increasing across the state for healthcare, and our public hospitals are seeing more patients presenting to emergency departments than ever before.
“QAS responds to up to 3,000 incidents a day – and they’re still responding to the most critical patients in optimum time frames.
“We’ll work with Queensland Health, QAS and unions to ensure that our health system remains strong.”
“The Health Minister needs to explain why standards are slipping at hospitals across Queensland and how she plans to fix it,” she said.
An additional $25 million will be spent this financial year to open more bed capacity across the system.
Ms Scalon said “hospital flow” needed to be at the top of the list for government. “The system is not coping,” she said.
***************************************
Climate scaremongers not held responsible for falsehoods
Tim Flannery still hasn’t paid a price for being wrong. Sydney’s Warragamba Dam is flooding again — which our former chief climate commissioner once said couldn’t happen.
In 2005, Flannery predicted Sydney’s dams could be empty in just two years because global warming was drying up the rains, leaving the city “facing extreme difficulties with water”.
In 2007, Flannery stepped up the scare, claiming global warming made the soil so hot that “even the rain that falls isn’t actually going to fill our dams and river systems”.
Yet for the second time in two years, Warragamba is overflowing. It also spilt over in 2012.
But where is Flannery?
He’s sure not saying sorry. Far from it; he’s just been named as a speaker at the taxpayer-funded Sydney Writers’ Festival, to lecture us on what “may be the last chance” to save ourselves from “the climate crisis”.
That’s how it goes with these climate catastrophists. Even when they’re wrong, the politico-media class forgives them because they were wrong in a sacred cause. They scare us into righteousness.
Check for yourself. Have you heard a single ABC presenter mention that Warragamba has again made a fool of Flannery? Or that Melbourne’s dams are now twice as full as they were when he made his dam-draining prediction?
Flannery is, of course, easy to mock. It’s hard to think of a global warming preacher who has been wrong so often.
This is the scaremonger who in 2008 warned of “a world five years from now, when there is no more ice over the Arctic”, who predicted Perth would become the world’s first “ghost metropolis” through lack of water, and who claimed we’d see cyclones “more frequently in the future”.
In fact, the Arctic ice and Perth are still there, and we’ve had fewer cyclones, not more.
Yet Flannery is only one of many climate catastrophists whose dud predictions are not held against them.
Take Robert Watson, a former chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Last month he co-wrote a United Nations report that warned us to cut our consumption because global warming was one of the man-made “climate emergencies” that had reduced “the Earth’s capacity to sustain current and future human wellbeing”.
His alarmist report was hyped by the media and especially by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who claimed we “might not thrive, even survive” because we’d waged a “suicidal war on nature”.
But why was anyone taking Watson seriously? Never mind that even his own report admitted world prosperity had actually doubled over the past 50 years.
Just consider his record. In 2004, this same Watson promoted a report on global warming that had been commissioned by the Pentagon and which predicted doom by 2020.
As The Guardian reported then, without a skerrick of scepticism, this “secret report” warned that “major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a ‘Siberian’ climate by 2020”, when “nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the word”.
None of that happened last year, or was ever likely to. Yet Watson had praised these off-the-wall predictions, claiming “it’s going to be hard to blow off this sort of document”, which was “hugely embarrassing” to then President George W. Bush.
Watson paid no price for peddling this trash. Instead, this British chemist was knighted in 2012.
And what price did Al Gore pay? In 2006, the former US vice-president claimed in his Academy Award-winning “documentary” An Inconvenient Truth that global warming was drowning Pacific islands under rising seas, and “the citizens of these Pacific nations have all had to evacuate to New Zealand”.
Labor fell for this “drowning islands” scare, producing a “Pacific climate change plan” promising to take in such global warming refugees, with Anthony Albanese, now Labor leader, piously declaring we couldn’t “sit by while people literally drown”.
In fact, Gore was preaching porkies. No global warming “refugees” were evacuated to New Zealand then or since, and low-lying Pacific island nations are actually much more likely to grow than shrink.
Professor Paul Kench and Dr Arthur Webb studied 27 atoll islands in the central Pacific and found 43 per cent had actually got bigger over recent decades, and just 14 cent — not the most populous — smaller.
But what does Gore care? Scares sell, and he’s now hailed as the world’s first “climate change billionaire”. If he was wrong, it was only for our own good, you see. And his.
***************************************
CoitalSafe? What a classic Aussie brain fart
Many Australian men have no idea about how sex starts, and often continues, for girls. Brace yourself for the disturbing truth.
Do we need a consent app for sexual relations? No, we don’t, and thanks should immediately go to Jacqui Lambie for cutting right to the chase on this one.
How easy is it going to be for a bloke to get a swipe-right from a woman who is chucking up in a bucket, she wanted to know? Quite right. Also, what’s to stop somebody from swiping the app for you, while you’re too drunk to stand?
How soon will we see a predator using the green tick to say, “See, I didn’t rape her! She was up for whatever went down.”
Also, what happens when you swipe right for yes, then change your mind when he tries to extend things beyond your comfort zone? And, who’s going to make this app? One of those creepy dudes from Facebook who can’t even understand why the massacre and suicide livestreams should come down? No thank you.
The government? No thank you again (although it would be interesting to see what they’d call it: CoitalSafe? Or F..ksSafe?) No, no, and no.
The idea — more like a classic Aussie brain fart — came from NSW police commissioner Mick Fuller, who said at the time that it might be the worst idea he’d had this year, before immediately being proven right.
Still, it was a bit odd to find it coming from a cop. Why do we need an app, Mick, when we’ve got a police force? It’s run in NSW … by you! Except that we all know how the legal system — existing law, the police, the courts — runs just like CovidSafe. As in, you might as well not have it.
Because here’s how it currently works: women and girls get assaulted, and nothing happens, and then the matter goes away. But not for them.
Why does it work this way?
Because women and girls are too ashamed to speak up when they’ve been assaulted; or else too fearful; or else they blame themselves; or else it’s her word against his and she knows she won’t be believed; or else there’s no evidence; or gathering the evidence is too horrifying an idea; and because it’s so much easier to just try to forget. Except they can’t. Which is why it doesn’t go away for them.
Which is why it’s also so important that Australia is now having this urgent, national conversation about consent.
Many men seem to have no idea how much unwanted sex — sexual assault and harassment basically — women endure over the course of their lives. In particular, they have no idea about how sex starts, and often continues, for girls.
Girls in Australia are being forced, cajoled, coerced or tricked into sex, often from an early age. Sometimes, it’s performing sex acts they don’t want to perform; sometime it’s about gaining access to a girl’s body.
Men — and, most importantly, boys — don’t seem to understand that girls, for a range of complex reasons (guilt, shame, anxiety, fear) don’t always know how to say no.
Thus we have a situation where boys are pushing themselves onto girls, who feel powerless to stop them. Girls are being made to do things they don’t want to do, earlier than they want to do them, by boys who feel curious, or entitled to explore.
You may not believe that such a thing is happening, but you don’t have to take my word for it. You can take the testimony of the 5000 Australian girls who have this month posted their experiences with sexual assault to a website established by a former Sydney schoolgirl, Chanel Contos.
Contos, 23, was assaulted by a boy — that is, forced to do something she didn’t want to do — when she was a student at a prestigious all-girls school in Sydney. She was 13. She didn’t know it was assault, because she didn’t know how — or that she was allowed — to say no.
It was many years before she confided her experience to a friend, who immediately said that something similar had happened to her.
They knew it was affecting their adult relationships (one of the worst things about this story is how girls are being assaulted in a routine manner while growing up, and then we send boys and girls into the world to try to work and live together).
Contos put a post on Instagram, asking whether other girls had similar stories — and then stood back, as the messages flooded in. One girl said she didn’t consent so much as “cave in” to pressure to start having sex when she was 13. “I knew I wasn’t ready. I don’t know why I felt this pressure, but I did, and it made me feel sick,” she said.
Another girl said: “We weren’t taught anything. I thought a man just haggling you was what they did, and women just gave in.”
Many girls remembered drinking until they passed out and waking to find themselves being assaulted, often by more than one boy. “I thought it was my fault because I got so drunk,” said one.
“I was only 13 and he was almost 17, it was New Years’ and he liked me, so I thought I had to like him back,” said another.
One girl said: “It has always stuck with me that it was something I never wanted to happen. I felt pressured into giving consent and still feel sick about it … I doubt he has ever given it a second thought … I spent my life thinking it was my fault and I’d done wrong.”
Another said: “I was 14 … he said if we had sex, he would be my boyfriend … he kept going while I lay there crying … when we came out of the bedroom, his friend congratulated him.”
One girl said she knew she had been filmed. Plenty said other kids had gathered around to watch while they were being groped while drunk. One wrote that she had developed a “reputation” after having sex, so regularly got drunk, “and I didn’t want to (have sex) but only did because I felt I may as well live up to the names I was getting called … I seriously struggled to have sex sober for the years following … I didn’t feel I deserved anyone good.”
On and on it goes, for hundreds of pages.
Is this really how you want your teenage daughter to experience sex? Of course it’s not. So what can be done?
Some say alcohol is the problem, and that is partly right. Ask around, you’ll discover that teenagers host these things call “gatherings” — we used to say parties — where kids smuggle alcohol, or the “cool” parents provide it. We know what happens when kids get drunk. Girls get assaulted.
Parents should supervise more closely, but it is naive to think young people are not going to drink and experiment. They are.
Some say it is not alcohol — there’s always been alcohol — but it might be pornography.
Remember how shocked you were to find a tame 1970s Playboy in your Dad’s shed? Children these days have access to unfiltered, unclassified pornography on their phones, from primary school (please don’t think “my kid would never look, he’s not interested” — because there’s always a bigger kid in the playground who cannot wait to show him.) We could talk about trying to restrict access to pornography, but the horse has bolted.
Young people have some better ideas. Contos, for example, has started a petition calling for consent to be part of sex education from an early age.
“We are advocating for younger generations to receive an education that (we) received far too late,” Contos writes on her petition.
“We are sad and angry we did not receive an adequate education regarding what amounts to sexual assault,” she adds.
It’s interesting, isn’t it? Girls don’t want to be told to “avoid sex” or to “keep themselves nice” as the old saying used to go. They are just as curious and delighted by the idea of sex as the boys are.
But they don’t want sex education to be “what goes where” and “how to make a baby” (or, more likely these days, how to avoid making a baby). They are looking forward to a shared and hopefully wonderful experience.
But to get there, you need consent. And to get there, you need respect.
************************************
Also see my other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE TIED)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
***************************************
Sunday, March 21, 2021
A penalty of being good-looking
The story below is from Kate Jones (above), a former Queensland politician. She is one of a number of women I have encountered or read about who say that their good looks are a curse in some ways, evoking inappropriate reactions from some men.
A lot depends on perception, however. What is harassment? I know well a self-confident and attractive lady who tells me that she deliberately wore short skirts while in her teens and early 20s. She enjoyed the whistles and other reactions that it evoked. She regarded them as compliments
Amid all the current furore about sexual harassment of women,the big question is whether the harassment is rare or common. Amid all the propaganda about the matter, it is hard to tell. I am inclined to think that it is common where the woman is good-looking -- which is deplorable but probably unalterable
To say that "education" can alter the way men interact with women is a bit of a laugh. Stalin thought that education could make a new Soviet man. It didn't
It may help to understand the teenage Kate Jones story if you know that she had well-developed breasts from an early age. That was bound to attract frequent male attention, not all of it sophisticated. She hersef diagnosed that problem by having her breasts reduced when she was 20 -- a most regrettable recourse
From when I was 15 years of age, I could not walk out my front door without men calling out at me, ogling me and even following me. It was a daily occurrence.
Just walking down the Queen Street Mall I was approached to work in strip clubs and pornography with promises of big money.
I was still at school.
I was groped by colleagues, taxi drivers, driving instructors, customers and strangers.
Once I had completed school and was a little older it just got worse and more brazen.
Having the operation gave me the opportunity to be seen and heard as a person for the first time. It was truly liberating.
That’s why when I started my first ministerial office job at 21, with my new-found confidence, I was gutted when an older and more senior advisor who worked for another Minister, started sexually harassing me.
I felt betrayed that this was happening even in government. That even in this professional environment which should be the benchmark that I couldn’t count on this behaviour being in my past.
I realised it would instead be very much a part of my future that I would have to continue to cope with like so many other women.
***************************************
Violence against women is abhorrent but the PM was RIGHT to avoid March 4 Justice rallies - which quickly turned into political witch-hunts, writes DES HOUGHTON
Scott Morrison took plenty of heat for spurning an invitation to attend the March 4 Justice rally in Canberra, but he had good reason not to.
Before we get into that I should say that any event that seeks to highlight violence against women is a worthy one, and thousands of decent Australians in nearly 40 cities and towns should be congratulated for embracing the “campaign for justice” and marching with their homemade #EnoughIsEnough posters.
Their motives were honorable.
However, some of the demonstrations had a decidedly ugly tone, especially in Canberra and Melbourne, where the protests seemed to be hijacked by the unions, the sniveling left, Get-Up! and assorted Green/Labor aligned whingers.
Perhaps Extinction Rebellion put in an appearance.
If you watched the television news footage, you will agree that the professional Coalition haters attempted to seize control from the genuinely concerned, and very nearly did. The Prime Minister was well-advised not to attend. He would have been met with heckles and abuse.
'Scotty from Marketing' and other put-downs would have filled the air, as his critics lashed out a leader they constantly accuse of inaction, but whose every deed they scorn and ridicule.
The protesters were egged on by the ALP and the ABC after Attorney-General Christian Porter revealed he was the subject of a 1988 rape allegation, which he strenuously denies.
The alleged rape in a ministerial office of Brittany Higgins, a former political adviser, had also fuelled public anger.
She addressed the rally in Canberra even though her rape case is pending. This was ill-advised, in my opinion.
Women's rights rallies come in waves, and trace their origins back to the suffragette marches in the UK in the 1860s. There were a series of Reclaim the Night marches across Britain in the 1970s after a series of rapes and murders.
As the marchers gathered around the nation for the March 4 Justice, ScoMo told Parliament the rallies were a 'triumph of democracy'. Perhaps.
Sexual assault in the workplace - or anywhere else for that matter - is unacceptable. But sexual harassment does not know political boundaries, so the attempts to portray recent scandals on partisan lines were unfair.
Bushie Susan McDonald, an LNP Senator from Queensland, provided clarity. She said: 'Sexual assault in the workplace is abhorrent and I have always had zero tolerance for it. 'It is for these reasons that I will observe today's march at Parliament House against sexual assault. 'But I cannot participate in what has turned into a nasty political witch-hunt organised by unions and the Greens.’'
McDonald was right.
The day before the march one of the organisers told The Australian newspaper that she was excited to accept Scott Morrison's invitation to meet with him and described it as a 'great moment in history'.
The next day she had mysteriously changed her mind and rejected the offer of a meeting. Then she denounced Morrison far and wide on social media and television and the digital media.
There was little doubt the radical Left had succeeded in persuading the marchers to see the sexual assault issue through a partisan lens and attack the Coalition. 'Liberals are rapists,' read one sign, proving the point.
It's hard to understand how demonizing a party that has the support of roughly half the voters can advance a cause, until you recognise that for too many, the cause was really just an avenue for their political vitriol.
Scott Morrison knew that, and he stayed inside.
***************************************
Scrapping NAPLAN and school rankings will only fail our children
Preventing student resilence and teacher accountability by scrapping NAPLAN and school rankings is no guarantee of success, writes Lucy Carne.
The manic attempt to protect the fragile self-esteem of students and teachers has got to stop.
Prizes for everyone! Learning play! 21st Century Skills! Overpaid consultants!
It’s clearly not working.
The latest move in the destruction of academic sensibility is the call to scrap the NAPLAN (National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy) test and the bizarre removal of school comparison data based on NAPLAN results.
Australian Education Union president Correna Haythorpe last week demanded the Federal Government axe the annual NAPLAN test as it was “plagued by a lack of credibility” and put “unnecessary pressure” on students.
It comes as Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) also blocked the compilation or publication of “league tables” by third parties and has changed its MySchool website to no longer offer school comparisons.
Parents can still search for a school’s past NAPLAN results on the taxpayer-funded portal, but cannot easily compare schools or see the best and worst performers.
Ms Haythorpe praised that decision, saying “the publication of NAPLAN league tables is damaging to school communities”.
But is this move to ban benchmarking really motivated by unions’ fear that parents will be misinformed by NAPLAN league tables or rather that the public will not be misinformed?
NAPLAN was introduced 13 years ago to provide critical information on school and student learning needs by testing the literacy and numeracy skills of every student in years 3, 5, 7 and 9.
It is Australia’s only national standardised test that provides long term big data to illuminate gaps in learning and skills and accurately guide curriculum planning, resource allocation and policy decisions.
The MySchool website was always contentious, but it offered parents, who once had no idea of how effective their local school’s teaching was, information to assist in their choice of school.
School performance comparison is not novel – Singapore, which consistently outperforms Australia in literacy and numeracy, provides parents with detailed school league tables, as does Britain.
Even ACARA’s own website says that “by providing extensive information on Australian schools, the My School website introduces a new level of transparency and accountability to schooling in Australia”.
Well, that’s no more.
Beyond school Open Days, Australian parents are now back to sourcing school intel from our neighbour’s personal trainer’s cousin whose kids went there eight years ago.
This assumption that parents will blindly choose a school based only on NAPLAN results is also absurd.
We all know that what makes a great school is more than just standardised test results held once a year – it’s the teacher turnover rate, athletic and creative programs offered, the school’s pedagogy, the commute from home or work, classroom resources, fees, uniform costs, even the state of the playground equipment or gardens.
But this veil of secrecy around how schools compare and lack of transparency and accountability will only let down our kids.
Rather than use NAPLAN results to advocate for improvement in education performance, the suppression of comparison protects underperforming teachers.
And it’s a symptom of the problem plaguing our schooling.
It’s the self-defeating desire to placate the fear of failure.
Feelings are fundamental. Kids must now pass everything. And teachers must not be held accountable.
It originates from the psychologist Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, where self-esteem is vital to self-actualisation.
Success is now a right, not a privilege achieved by the lessons of defeat and failure. And comparison has become problematic and only holds people back.
An example of this madness is the famous Californian education report Toward a State of Self-esteem that stated: “Appreciating my own worth and importance does not depend on measuring the quantity or quality of my abilities against those of someone else … The point is not to become acceptable or worthy but to acknowledge the worthiness that already exists. Our feelings are part of this and accepting them builds our self-esteem.”
It’s a malaise that has even spread to higher education.
I write this as a current Masters student having returned back to university after 18 years since my last degree and I’m staggered by the lack of rigorous exams I was expecting.
Every assessment is an assignment and many are in groups. It’s basically impossible to fail.
Like thinking that printing more money will make us richer, blocking school comparisons and protecting students from the pressure of standardised testing will not make us more successful.
Ultimately, this denial of resilience and accountability will fail us all.
*************************************
Extraordinary negligence by building regulators in NSW
A Sydney apartment buyer stands to lose her life savings or be forced to buy into a 300-unit development that she has been warned contains major defects.
Maryam Behrouz’s pursuit of the great Australian dream has become “a nightmare” after being told she must settle the $625,500 purchase in Kellyville because the building has been ticked off by a private certifier.
When Ms Behrouz tracked down the certifier’s documentation she was horrified to discover unlicensed tradies had signed off on the building work in potential breach of legislation.
The documents were later altered in suspicious circumstances to address her concerns by a mysterious person called “Muzza”.
Despite council discovering “considerable non-compliances” in the building, Ms Behrouz’s pleas for regulators to intervene have been fruitless.
In September the NSW Department of Fair Trading told her the matter is not “within its jurisdiction”.
The saga raises questions about whether defective buildings are still falling through the cracks despite NSW building commissioner David Chandler being given sweeping powers to clean up the industry in the wake of the Opal and Mascot tower evacuations.
This week a Fair Trading spokeswoman clarified that because Ms Behrouz’s initial complaint was about a contractual matter, she was advised to seek legal advice.
The spokesperson added that Ms Behrouz was contacted again by the department on Friday and her subsequent complaint against the private certifier was being reviewed “as a priority”.
The spokeswoman said there was no route to complain directly to the Building Commissioner about defects but encouraged complaints to Fair Trading and said it could take action if breaches had occurred.
Ms Behrouz, an engineer, squirrelled away her pay cheques and by 2017 put down a 10 percent deposit on an off-the-plan unit in the $52 million Peony Place development at Kellyville.
“I was so excited to buy this unit,” she recalled. “I was so positive, maybe too positive.”
The developer, Shanghai-based Boill Holding Group, enlisted local builder Decode.
By last August, Ms Behrouz’s home was complete.
She was accompanied to the pre-settlement inspection by Igor Vavrica, a registered architect, qualified engineer and licensed builder.
Mr Vavrica’s verdict was stark: the building did not comply with the National Construction Code or Australian standards. His laser measurements showed the fire evacuation path and parking space did not meet minimum size requirements and there was insufficient drainage.
Mr Vavrica’s concerns were backed by Paul Curran, the fire safety co-ordinator at Hills Shire Council.
“An inspection has confirmed that in our view, there are considerable non-compliances,” Mr Curran wrote to Mr Vavrica.
He said council would issue a fire safety order and refer the private certifier to disciplinary authorities for investigation.
Ms Behrouz fired off a letter, demanding the defects be fixed or her deposit be refunded.
The developer wouldn’t budge. Boill’s lawyers argued the private certifier had issued an occupation certificate and under the contract this was proof the building was free from major defects.
Ms Behrouz and Mr Vavrica eventually obtained a copy of the occupation certificate from council under freedom of information.
It was accompanied by signed certificates from each subcontractor confirming their work complied with Australian standards.
Mr Vavrica was alarmed that some of the certificates were signed by persons with no qualifications or qualifications in the wrong field.
The cladding certificate was signed by a bricklayer with an expired licence, working for an unlicensed company.
The formwork certificate was signed by a man whose licence had been cancelled by Fair Trading – which usually occurs if it has been fraudulently obtained or the holder has committed a crime or gone bankrupt.
The electrical certificates were signed by a person without an electrician’s licence, who appeared to be a carpenter.
Ms Behrouz and Mr Vavrica contacted the private certifier with their concerns, who provided them with his own copies of the documentation.
To the pair’s astonishment, multiple certificates were now signed by a different person altogether, who was licensed.
The documents’ edit history showed they had been altered the day before by someone called “Muzza”, who appeared to be employed by one of the project’s contractors.
Some of the certificates were mismatched because the name had changed but the contact number and email had not.
“Muzza must have been in a hurry,” Mr Vavrica said.
A Boill spokesman said the development met all relevant legislative requirements, including the Building Code of Australia. He said Ms Behrouz was the only customer to contest settlement.
Boill and Decode each stressed the occupation certificate was issued and project signed off by a fully independent and qualified certifier.
They said minor defects were being rectified as they were identified.
“We are determined to deliver a first-class property and 90 per cent of defects identified have already been rectified,” the Decode spokesman said.
The private certifier was formerly part of Dix Gardner Group, which has had two certifiers banned after being reprimanded 30 times between them.
He strongly denied there were “considerable non-compliances” in the building. His measurements showed the fire escape was compliant and the drainage and carparks had been confirmed as compliant by engineers, he said.
“Building certifiers can only capture a snapshot of a building and must rely on certification from relevant specialist consultants and contractors” he said.
He said the certifier was not responsible if other parties engaged in misleading conduct by retrospectively altering documents.
NSW Fair Trading confirmed the head building contractor was responsible for ensuring tradespeople had valid licences, although a certifier had to make reasonable efforts to scrutinise documentation.
“The builder (head contractor) is in breach of the Home Building Act if they sub-contract residential building work to an unlicensed entity (either individual or corporation),” the spokesperson said.
Ms Behrouz has been issued with legal demands from the developer to settle the purchase.
She abandoned action before the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal due to mounting legal costs. “I work in the building services and construction industry so when they say that it’s not compliant I know how serious that is,” Ms Behrouz said. “Honestly it’s just a nightmare for me.”
Ms Behrouz’s family in Iran has been shocked at her experience in a first world country.
“When I went to Australia dad thought ‘that’s a safe place for my girl’,” Ms Behrouz recalled.
************************************
Also see my other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE TIED)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
***************************************
Saturday, March 20, 2021
Aboriginal distrust of the police
Aborigines have a lot of contact with the police because they commit a lot of crimes. Those encounters often end up badly so there are calls for the police to "do something" about that.
They seem to overlook that they have in their own hands an excellent way to improve their relationships with the police: Stop committing crimes. Their high rate of criminality -- particularly among young Aborigines -- is bound to create dislike of them among the police and that will show, one way or another
"They don't like me, and I don't like them".
In one simple sentence, a young man laid bare his experience of the often fraught relationship between Indigenous children and police.
His words weren't said in a casual conversation on the street but in a courtroom — and that scathing statement is forming part of a high-profile coronial investigation.
Three years ago, when that young man was 17, he watched his two friends drown in front of him while they were all trying to escape from the police.
A group of youths ran into Perth's Swan River trying to outrun two police officers pursuing them after a nearby break and enter.
This week, that young man was forced to relive those traumatic moments for the coronial inquest into their deaths in Perth. His anger was palpable, his distrust of authorities clear.
The man, who for legal reasons was referred to only as "P", watched footage showing the police officers entering a powerful, wide stretch of the Swan River in a rescue attempt.
His response to the video of tactical response officers in the water was blunt: "He [the officer] could've gone in sooner."
The young man's words made it clear that he was unconvinced any police officer might try to save the life of someone from his community.
The coroner will eventually make recommendations about how to heal this relationship between the community and the police and ways to avoid such tragic deaths, but for the families involved it will never be enough.
If you can't understand that young man's anger and distrust, let me try to explain.
It's not just him, but his immediate circle and the broader Indigenous community who are angry that their people are still dying this way, despite decades-long calls for change.
In the past month alone, there have been several painful reminders for Indigenous Australians that reinforce their beliefs they can't always trust the state to keep them safe.
This month, there were three deaths in custody within weeks of each other, 30 years on from the royal commission that handed down 339 recommendations to stop this from happening.
Just months ago, tens of thousands of Australians took to the streets in Black Lives Matter protests, calling on the nation's leaders to change the record on Indigenous deaths in custody.
The most recent deaths were compounded by the bruising findings of a separate coronial inquest handed down this month into the 2018 death of Anaiwan-Dunghutti man Nathan Reynolds in a Sydney jail.
The coroner concluded that he died from an asthma attack but that the prison's health response was "confused, uncoordinated and unreasonably delayed."
Put simply, the state "deprived him of any chance at survival", the coroner said.
These recent deaths show us what lessons have been lost with the passing of time.
For years, the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody made national headlines, led news bulletins, exposed a nation's cultural and legal shortcomings.
The hope was that the findings in 1991 could heal the fractured relationship between the Indigenous community and the authorities they had learnt not to trust.
But recent weeks have shown that many of those lessons of honesty, transparency and accountability have faded, along with the hope of meaningful change.
Report after report investigates Indigenous over-incarceration, the causes and solutions repeated time after time — yet the situation does not improve and the community's trust erodes.
Since that royal commission, there's been an explosion in the number of Indigenous Australians locked up.
Back then they made up 14 per cent of prisoners, now it's almost 30 per cent.
Despite some moves to make prisons and police cells safer, there have been hundreds of Indigenous deaths in custody since that report was handed down three decades ago next month.
Two of the most recent deaths that happened in recent weeks were only made public under intense questioning in a parliamentary estimates session.
The New South Wales Corrective Services Commissioner Peter Severin defended the move to keep them private, but for the Indigenous community, the secrecy was salt in an old wound.
It was a reminder that after all these years the relationship hasn't changed.
Again, for the community, it was a reason not to trust; a reason to be angry.
'Soul-crushing' search for justice for families
Waiting for months or years to hear about the last moments of your loved ones has become a well-worn path for Indigenous families relying on the coronial process to deliver the truth.
The result can be "soul-crushing", according to Taleah Reynolds, who has lived through this harsh reality during the coronial inquest into her sibling's death.
Her 36-year-old brother Nathan died in his prison cell, just one week before he was expected to be released.
The coroner's report this month found "numerous system deficiencies and individual errors of judgment" contributed to the death and provided her family with little comfort.
"This can't just be treated as an accident — it must be recognised as a huge institutional failing and people must be held responsible," Ms Reynolds said outside court at the time.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-20/aboriginal-deaths-in-custody-cycle-continues/13263726
***************************************A totally useless building watchdog in Queensland
A $770,000 dream home built for a disabled woman with money from her $6 million hospital negligence payout is to be bulldozed.
The demolition decision follows nearly three years of dithering by the State Government’s building watchdog, the Queensland Building and Construction Commission.
“It’s been agreed it has to be demolished,” a spokesman said.
The decision has political ramifications. I’m told Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk is losing confidence with Mick de Brenni, her trouble-prone Works Minister who has been unable to contain growing public distrust of the commission.
The so-called watchdog was initially handed a list of 59 defects in the home built on Marine Parade, Redcliffe, by Linda Hartman for her wheelchair-bound daughter Paige.
“It was supposed to be her ‘forever home’ for when (my husband) Rob and I leave the planet,” Hartman said.
Paige was left with brain damage after her treatment for a seizure was botched at Royal Brisbane Hospital when she was just 15 months old. She is now 24.
“She has no speech and has no capacity to understand anything,” her mother said.
“Paige requires 24-hour-a-day care. We feed her through a tube in her stomach.’’
The Supreme Court heard Paige was diagnosed with herpes simplex encephalitis in 1998 but suffered a devastating brain injury.
“In consequence of the damage to her brain, the applicant has been left profoundly disabled,” the court heard.
“She suffers from a range of physical and cognitive deficits with only a limited capacity to communicate.
“She is distinctly incapable of managing her own affairs.”
Hartman accused the QBCC of callously adding to her family’s torment.
She called for an inquiry into the commission.
“The system has to change,” Hartman said.
“They treated us like pigs.”
She said Mick de Brenni had declined to face her.
“I would really like to meet him.”
She said she had phoned his ministerial office and his electorate office in Logan several times to complain about the QBCC.
But she was repeatedly referred back to the agency by his staff.
An independent assessment also showed the home had rising damp.
Hartman and she and her daughter moved out in July 2019 after an enviro specialist detected toxic mould spores.
Hartman blamed the mould for an adverse reaction that caused Paige to be rushed to hospital. Paige required a sealed room like a hospital room with hydraulic lifts and no dust.
The Hartman case is one of hundreds that embroiled the QBCC in controversy.
State Ombudsman Anthony Reilly reported to Parliament that there are more complaints each year against the QBCC than any other statutory authority.
About 200 grievances are lodged each year.
De Brenni has failed to restore trust in the agency.
As complaints mount, the question must be asked: Is he up to the task?
De Brenni has declined to comment or be interviewed.
He has also ignored a call to publicly back the QBCC, whose board includes foul-mouthed CFMEU official Jade Ingham, who has a history of industrial unlawfulness and other Labor fellow travellers.
Regrettably, Hartman’s ordeal is far from over.
The QBCC approved the maximum $200,000 compensation under the Queensland Home Warranty Scheme it administers.
So Paige’s trust fund, administered by Perpetual, will be short by over $500,000 for a rebuild.
Perpetual has announced it is suing the builder, P.J. Burns.
Principal Rick Burns declined to comment.
However a staff member said: “There is more to this than meets the eye. It will come out in court.”
Meanwhile, a Brisbane doctor who criticised the QBCC for allowing an apartment block to be built too close to his home creating a fire hazard has blasted the Crime and Corruption Commission for failing to thoroughly investigate his complaint.
Junior surgeon Shaun McCrystal said the CCC had referred his complaint back to the QBCC in August 2019 under its “devolution principle”.
But the CCC failed to follow up.
“I’ve seen the CCC’s assessment documents, and they concluded the QBCC’s conduct was capable of amounting to corrupt conduct, so I don’t even think it’s up for debate,’’ he said.
“I thought (the CCC) would at least ask why I’ve had nothing but silence from the QBCC, particularly after the Premier’s office intervened and asked them to have another look at the allegations.
“It would be an understatement to say I’ve been left perplexed and extremely disappointed by the CCC’s inaction.’’
HOMEOWNER SCORES PARTIAL WIN
A Townsville homeowner who fears his house will be blown away in a cyclone has won a partial victory with a legal tribunal agreeing his house was built with the wrong cyclone rating.
Mark Agius successfully argued in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal that his $400,000 three-bedroom Mount Louisa house fell significantly short of critical structural requirements determined by Australian standards for wind classification and did not comply with the Building Code or strict manufacturer installation guidelines.
Agius said he was forced to begin civil proceedings against a Townsville builder because the State Government building watchdog, the QBCC, failed to enforce the Building Code once it was discovered the builder had downgraded the wind ratings from Cyclone 3 to Cyclone 2.
He engaged independent wind and building experts who pointed to 75 major defects, including structural faults.
The QBCC had treated him appallingly, he said.
***************************************
Family questions ruling on doctor after granny’s horrific death
The family of a woman who died a painful death after her leg rotted plans to take legal action after a decision which found the woman’s doctor had NO CASE TO ANSWER. [Incredible]
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency and its board investigated the doctor who treated Norma Palmer, while she was a resident at Regis Birkdale aged care home.
Mrs Palmer, 89, died three days after being rushed to hospital for treatment to a wound on her leg which had rotted to the bone.
Ms Palmer’s granddaughter Alana Hewett said she had contacted lawyers about the AHPRA decision after a coroner’s report said the failure to appropriately manage a lower limb ulcer contributed to the grandmother’s death.
“I am still completely baffled at the decision made by the medical board,” Ms Hewett said.
“I will not rest until I believe justice has been served for her.”
The AHPRA investigation found there was insufficient information to show the doctor had not practised to an accepted standard.
AHPRA national manager Mark Braybrook said the board completed a risk assessment into the doctor. “We made a permanent record of your concerns about the practitioner on our database,” Mr Braybrook told the family in an email. “We have advised the doctor about the concerns that you raised.
“We then considered the information you provided with your concerns, the information that was available on our database, including previous concerns raised, and information that was relevant about the practitioner’s work environment.
“After taking these steps and considering all of this information, we believe this is all that is required at this time. We have decided not to take further action.”
Mr Braybrook said the Aged Care Quality Safety Commission dealt with complaints about multiple practitioners who would have provided care to Mrs Palmer.
He said AHPRA only progressed individual concerns when there was a risk of harm to the public that would not be adequately managed by the practitioner or their employer.
Ms Hewett’s complaints about Regis Birkdale were also lodged with the Aged Care Quality Safety Commission, which found Regis Birkdale did not consistently provide a satisfactory level of care to Mrs Palmer and that there were “significant gaps” in pain management and wound management.
ACQSC commissioner Janet Anderson said a surprise visit to Regis Birkdale in December to assess personal care and clinical care benchmarks found the service compliant.
“Should the commission have ongoing concerns about care and services at Regis Birkdale, the commission will take a proportionate, risk-based approach in determining any regulatory response,” Ms Anderson said.
State Health Minister Yvette D’Ath said the case was a matter for the federal authorities. “This is a deeply concerning and distressing case and it was shocking to hear,” she said.
“Private aged care is the responsibility of the Commonwealth regulator and we would expect the regulator to do everything possible to protect residents.”
***************************************
How much UQ spent on Drew Pavlou disciplinary action
The stunning amount the University of Queensland spent on legal advice as part of its disciplinary action against anti-China activist Drew Pavlou has been revealed.
The University of Queensland spent more than $280,000 on external legal advice in its disciplinary hearings of anti-China activity Drew Pavlou, but rejected claims it was “pursuing” him.
UQ Chancellor Peter Varghese told a Senate hearing that claims from Mr Pavlou that the university sought to make an example out of him because China was a lucrative source of revenue was a “conspiracy theory”.
It comes as the university said China’s coercive behaviour had become “more blatant” in the past three years and universities recognised the need to diversify international students.
CCC rejects Pavlou’s corruption claims
Mr Pavlou told a Parliamentary hearing into national security at universities last week that his suspension from the university was a politically motivated “investigation in search of a crime” and an example of “moral corruption”.
Mr Varghese, a former Australian diplomat, said the proceedings against Mr Pavlou were not politically motivated, but a matter of misconduct which went to a disciplinary committee and then to a university senate appeals committee.
He said nine of 11 charges against Mr Pavlou were dismissed and his suspension was dropped from two years to one semester.
“If it were in fact a kangaroo court it would be one of the rare occasion a kangaroo court dismissed most of the charges and reduced the penalty,” the chancellor said.
“My view is it was handled in accordance with established processes.”
Mr Varghese said three law firms were engaged for legal advice during the process, one each for the disciplinary board, the senate disciplinary appeals committee and the university administration at a cost of $287,000.
On a different line of questioning in the committee, Mr Varghese also said China’s global tactics, which included appealing to groups including business and universities to convey a message to decision makers, had become more assertive in the past three years.
“What we’ve seen since then is not just a ramping up of China’s coercive behaviour and a more blatant use of economic leverage, but also a recognition in the Australian community, and I would extend that to large parts of business and also now the university sector, that on some of these core issues there was a need to take action and hold firm,” he said.
“Universities were alway conscious they needed to diversify the source country of their international students and that an over dependence on one country was exposing them to a level of risk.
“The bottom line remains as we look to the post-COVID period … and the resumption of international students coming to Australia that we pursue a diversification policy with more success than we have up until now.”
************************************
Also see my other blogs. Main ones below:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com (DISSECTING LEFTISM)
http://snorphty.blogspot.com (TONGUE TIED)
http://antigreen.blogspot.com (GREENIE WATCH)
http://pcwatch.blogspot.com (POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH)
http://edwatch.blogspot.com (EDUCATION WATCH)
https://heofen.blogspot.com/ (MY OTHER BLOGS)
***************************************
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Australian Politics


Evelyn Rae, a conservative Australian political commentator


My son Joe at ANU
One of the happiest pictures ever -- Cleo Smith, aged 4
